Airbnb AI integration ChatGPT

Why Airbnb Says “Not Yet” to ChatGPT—And What That Means for AI in Travel

Posted on October 22, 2025 at 10:45 PM

TiWhy Airbnb Says “Not Yet” to ChatGPT—And What That Means for AI in Travel

When Airbnb CEO Brian Chesky recently revealed that the company is not plugging its main app into ChatGPT—despite the AI’s striking capabilities—it sent ripples through both the tech and travel worlds. The reason? Clearly, Airbnb isn’t convinced the time is right.

Here’s what’s going on—and why it matters.

🚀 What Airbnb is doing (and not doing)

Chesky made plain that while Airbnb uses multiple AI models within its operations, it has not embraced OpenAI’s latest models at scale—calling them “faster and cheaper” alternatives. One key quote: “We typically don’t use them that much in production because there are faster and cheaper models.” (Los Angeles Times)

Here are the main facts:

  • Airbnb’s in-house customer-service bot, launched broadly in the U.S. in English earlier this year, now uses 13 different AI models, including those from OpenAI, Google (Alphabet), Alibaba’s Qwen, and open-source systems. (Los Angeles Times)
  • The company is leaning heavily on Alibaba’s Qwen model, which it describes as “very good… fast and cheap.” (South China Morning Post)
  • Why no ChatGPT integration yet? Chesky says ChatGPT’s “app integration” capabilities aren’t quite at the level Airbnb needs—especially given the platform’s community, trust and verification elements. (Los Angeles Times)
  • Despite the caution, Airbnb is doubling down on AI-driven features: it says the rollout of its enhanced in-app assistant reduced human-agent contact by 15%, and some problem resolutions dropped from ~3 hours to just ~6 seconds. (EMARKETER)

🧐 Why the cautious approach?

From Chesky’s perspective and from market signals, several forces are at play:

  1. Ready for production vs. flashy demo – Just because AI models look impressive in a demo doesn’t mean they are production-hardened. Airbnb’s emphasis on reliability, community trust and moderation likely raises the bar.
  2. Cost & speed matter – If an AI model is slower or more expensive without commensurate value, the business case weakens. The mention of “faster and cheaper” models signals Airbnb is optimising for that.
  3. Control and platform stickiness – As Airbnb evolves from just lodging to broader experiences and services (messaging between guests, social features, etc.), keeping the AI stack flexible and closely controlled probably matters more than being on the AI bleeding edge.
  4. AI-agent risk – As noted in industry analysis, travel platforms face a future where AI agents could book flights or stays directly, potentially bypassing the intermediary platform. (Financial Times) Airbnb may be trying to hedge this risk by controlling how AI integrates rather than rushing into third-party plug-ins.

🌍 What the implications are (for travel, AI and users)

  • For Airbnb: The company’s cautious pace may pay off if models aren’t ready for full rollout—fewer surprises, better user trust and retainment of control. On the flip side, if competitors move faster and capture user mindshare via deeper AI integrations, Airbnb could risk falling behind.
  • For AI in travel: The episode underscores that generative-AI and “agentic” bots still have hurdles—especially in high-trust, community-driven services like lodging and hospitality. Not every application should chase “ChatGPT” integration for the sake of it.
  • For users: For now, expect Airbnb’s AI enhancements to be incremental (faster support, smarter in-app tools) rather than radical (booking by voice via ChatGPT or chatting via new interface). Over time, you might see more features—but on Airbnb’s terms.
  • For industry watchers: This signals that open-source and hybrid AI stacks (Alibaba Qwen, etc) may gain traction as major players weigh cost, control and readiness as much as raw novelty.

📝 Glossary

  • Generative AI: AI systems that generate content (text, images, code) rather than just classifying or analysing.
  • Agentic AI / Digital agent: A system that can carry out tasks autonomously on behalf of a user (e.g., book travel, order services) rather than just answer queries.
  • Model “in production”: A model that is integrated into a company’s live systems and used by real users, as opposed to being in testing or internal.
  • Open-source AI: AI models whose underlying code, architecture or training data are publicly available (or modifiable) rather than proprietary.
  • Platform “stickiness”: A measure of how likely users are to return or stay with a platform because of its features, community or ecosystem.

In short: Airbnb isn’t backing out of AI—it’s holding its cards close as it chooses when and how to integrate. For a company whose core business thrives on trust, global scale and community, that strategy makes sense. But in a world racing toward agentic AI, “wait and see” may become a gamble.

Source link: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/10/22/airbnb-chatgpt-ai-chesky.html

FEATURED TAGS
computer program javascript nvm node.js Pipenv Python 美食 AI artifical intelligence Machine learning data science digital optimiser user profile Cooking cycling green railway feature spot 景点 work technology F1 中秋节 dog setting sun sql photograph Alexandra canal flowers bee greenway corridors programming C++ passion fruit sentosa Marina bay sands pigeon squirrel Pandan reservoir rain otter Christmas orchard road PostgreSQL fintech sunset thean hou temple in sungai lembing 海上日出 SQL optimization pieces of memory 回忆 garden festival ta-lib backtrader chatGPT generative AI stable diffusion webui draw.io streamlit LLM AI goverance prompt engineering fastapi stock trading artificial-intelligence Tariffs AI coding AI agent FastAPI 人工智能 Tesla AI5 AI6 FSD AI Safety AI governance LLM risk management Vertical AI Insight by LLM LLM evaluation AI safety enterprise AI security AI Governance Privacy & Data Protection Compliance Microsoft Scale AI Claude Anthropic 新加坡传统早餐 咖啡 Coffee Singapore traditional coffee breakfast Quantitative Assessment Oracle OpenAI Market Analysis Dot-Com Era AI Era Rise and fall of U.S. High-Tech Companies Technology innovation Sun Microsystems Bell Lab Agentic AI McKinsey report Dot.com era AI era Speech recognition Natural language processing ChatGPT Meta Privacy Google PayPal Edge AI Enterprise AI Nvdia AI cluster COE Singapore Shadow AI AI Goverance & risk Tiny Hopping Robot Robot Materials SCIGEN RL environments Reinforcement learning Continuous learning Google play store AI strategy Model Minimalism Fine-tuning smaller models LLM inference Closed models Open models Privacy trade-off MIT Innovations Federal Reserve Rate Cut Mortgage Interest Rates Credit Card Debt Management Nvidia SOC automation Investor Sentiment Enterprise AI adoption AI Innovation AI Agents AI Infrastructure Humanoid robots AI benchmarks AI productivity Generative AI Workslop Federal Reserve AI automation Multimodal AI AI agents AI integration Market Volatility Government Shutdown Rate-cut odds AI Fine-Tuning LLMOps Frontier Models Hugging Face Multimodal Models Energy Efficiency AI coding assistants AI infrastructure Semiconductors Gold & index inclusion Multimodal Chinese open-source AI AI hardware Semiconductor supply chain Open-Source AI prompt injection LLM security AI spending AI Bubble Quantum Computing Open-source AI AI shopping Multi-agent systems AI research breakthroughs AI in finance Financial regulation Custom AI Chips Solo Founder Success Newsletter Business Models Indie Entrepreneur Growth robotaxi AI security embodied AI IPO artificial intelligence venture capital AI chatbot AI browser space funding quantum computing DeepSeek enterprise AI AI investing AI investment prompt injection attacks AI red teaming agentic browsing agentic AI cybersecurity model quantization AI therapy AI bubble